Shae McDonald
(AAP), The Courier-Mail
September 30, 2016
12:01amExtract:
Brisbane Arcade Murder: Renewed calls to appeal Reginald Brown’s conviction
D Moles established the research group Networked Knowledge 16 years ago and also co-founded the Miscarriages of Justice Project at Flinders University in South Australia.
He told Australian Story he thought it likely police “got the wrong person” when they convicted Brown of Ms Armstrong’s murder.
The former law professor told The Courier-Mail there were
certain features about Brown’s trial that were “very unsatisfactory”.
Dr Moles said in order for a conviction to be set aside on
appeal, a court needed to be satisfied there were errors at trial, not whether
the evidence pointed to a person being guilty or innocent.“The question is did the person have a fair trial,” he said.
Dr Moles said there were several pieces of physical evidence
used during the original court case that “raised alarm bells”.
One of them was the fact Ms Armstrong’s body was “infested” with
ants.
Dr Moles said the logical question to ask was where they came
from.
“There wasn’t an ants nest within the medical room or medical
centre,” he said.
“What it would tell me is that it’s likely she was attacked and
either disabled or killed somewhere else, where there were ants.
“Her body was subsequently moved to the medical rooms, with the
ants on board.”